2018年9月12日水曜日
Exercises 3
3.2
2. Different authors have accounted for the President's actions in different ways.
4. It is often most effective to present your data in a chart or table.
2. Different authors have accounted for the President's actions in different ways.
4. It is often most effective to present your data in a chart or table.
Series review
Atama-ii books are great tools!!!
・You can choose a lot of stories so you enjoy reading many times.
・You can understand well because the books have choices.
・These books have a vivid picture per page so reading is fun.
・It is possible to read in a short time.
・Easy English words are used so this series is good for the beginner to learn.
Impression of reader
“ It is easy to keep reading everyday for me!! Learning is fun.” By Ms. Do
“ I could enjoy learning English!!” By Ms. wattan
From these, English ability improves by using Atama-ii books!!!
Why don’t you buy these books?? :)
Information:
Difficulty: 300 headwords.
Length: 2,500 words per story.
Pages: 23 text pages/23 illustrations. (8/8 per story thread; 8 endings total)
Writers:
Andy Boon/James Broadbridge/Ramy Habeeb/Lesley Ito/Theresa Kannenberg/Kyle Maclauchlan/Paul Raine/Marcos Benevides/
Group members
・Watanabe Nanako ・Donoue Yui
・Kawasaki Kosuke ・Yusuke Hirata
2018年9月11日火曜日
Exercises 2
2-1
1. Environmental issues should be at the top of today's political agenda.
6. The Peter Principle states that members of a hierarchical group will usually end up being promoted to the point at which they become incompetent.
1. Environmental issues should be at the top of today's political agenda.
6. The Peter Principle states that members of a hierarchical group will usually end up being promoted to the point at which they become incompetent.
AWL Subject1 sentences
Background: Patients with sickle cell disease (SCD) report pain scores that appear greater than those reported in a meta-analysis for patients with cancer,
背景：癌細胞（SCD）をもつ患者は、痛みのスコアは癌患者のメタ分析報告よりも酷くあらわれるものだと報告する。
Design: Descriptive comparative study.
計画：記述計算量研究
The participants were outpatients (N = 415) from three studies
その参加者はみっつの研究の415人の外来患者だった。
Methods: Patients completed the PAINReport It including pain location, quality, pattern, intensity, expectation, satisfaction, and demographic questions.
方法：患者は、痛みの位置・質・パターン・ 高度・予測・満足度・人口統計学的疑問が含まれたPAINR水平ポートを満たした。
Analyses included the χ2 test, analysis of variance, and regression. Results: Outpatients with SCD reported more pain location sites than the race-discordant (p < .001) and race-concordant (p < .001) cancer groups
x2テスト・分散・復帰を含む分析。結果：SCD外来患者は人種調整と非人種調整よりも更に痛む位置を報告した。
The three groups did not differ significantly on pain expectation (p = .06).
三つのグループで予測した痛みに有意差はなかった。
there was a significant difference between the race-concordant and SCD (p = .006) groups,
それらは人種調整とSCDとの間でかなり異なった。
Conclusions: Outpatients with SCD reported three of four sensory pain parameters that were greater than those reported by outpatients with cancer.
結論：SCD外来患者は、知覚的痛みのパラメーターの３/４は癌患者によって報告されたものよりも大きいことを報告した。
but reported lower worst pain intensity in the previous 24 hours than race-concordant patients with cancer.
しかし、先の24時間では人種調整癌患者よりも患者最も低い痛みの大きさが報告された。
These findings will be helpful for planning future research on appropriate pain treatment protocols for different pain populations.
これらの発見は、異なる人種の痛みのための、現れた痛みの扱いを防ぐ将来研究の設計の助けになるだろう。
背景：癌細胞（SCD）をもつ患者は、痛みのスコアは癌患者のメタ分析報告よりも酷くあらわれるものだと報告する。
Design: Descriptive comparative study.
計画：記述計算量研究
The participants were outpatients (N = 415) from three studies
その参加者はみっつの研究の415人の外来患者だった。
Methods: Patients completed the PAINReport It including pain location, quality, pattern, intensity, expectation, satisfaction, and demographic questions.
方法：患者は、痛みの位置・質・パターン・ 高度・予測・満足度・人口統計学的疑問が含まれたPAINR水平ポートを満たした。
Analyses included the χ2 test, analysis of variance, and regression. Results: Outpatients with SCD reported more pain location sites than the race-discordant (p < .001) and race-concordant (p < .001) cancer groups
x2テスト・分散・復帰を含む分析。結果：SCD外来患者は人種調整と非人種調整よりも更に痛む位置を報告した。
The three groups did not differ significantly on pain expectation (p = .06).
三つのグループで予測した痛みに有意差はなかった。
there was a significant difference between the race-concordant and SCD (p = .006) groups,
それらは人種調整とSCDとの間でかなり異なった。
Conclusions: Outpatients with SCD reported three of four sensory pain parameters that were greater than those reported by outpatients with cancer.
結論：SCD外来患者は、知覚的痛みのパラメーターの３/４は癌患者によって報告されたものよりも大きいことを報告した。
but reported lower worst pain intensity in the previous 24 hours than race-concordant patients with cancer.
しかし、先の24時間では人種調整癌患者よりも患者最も低い痛みの大きさが報告された。
These findings will be helpful for planning future research on appropriate pain treatment protocols for different pain populations.
これらの発見は、異なる人種の痛みのための、現れた痛みの扱いを防ぐ将来研究の設計の助けになるだろう。
2018年9月10日月曜日
Course's Exercises
1.2 More formal
(1) The book is mainly (primarily) concerned with the problem of policing the internet.
(2) Almost (Virtually) every school in the county had reported problems with the new system.
(3) The work of the Institute is not only (solely) devoted to cancer research.
(1) The book is mainly (primarily) concerned with the problem of policing the internet.
(2) Almost (Virtually) every school in the county had reported problems with the new system.
(3) The work of the Institute is not only (solely) devoted to cancer research.
Book review
Book review
Brainstorm
"NO!" you scream, taking your helmet off.
It's too late. You look at Dr. Murphy on the operating table. His head is...gone!
This quotation from Brainstorm is final of story.
From this book, I think nanotechnology is formidable.
In general, It is very useful but it is complex and breakable... : (
When we use it, need to be careful!!
What do you think about nanotechnology? Is it dangerous or useful?
Please tell me your thought!
Let's talk about it together! :)
Boon, A. (2015). Brainstorm. Florida and Tokyo: Atama-ii Books.
登録:
投稿 (Atom)